AI
—At least five distinct stories from two sources in 72 hours are required.
3 distinct stories · 1 sources · last 72hEXPERIMENTAL / EDITORIAL INDEX
GLOBAL FUD METER.
One number cannot explain the world. This one does not pretend to. It is a transparent reading of recent source-linked headlines, and it disappears when the evidence is thin.
GLOBAL FUD—INSUFFICIENT DATA
INSUFFICIENT DATA
Not enough signal yet.
The global index needs valid scores from at least four categories. We will not draw a dramatic number from a handful of stories.
Method editorial-v1.0 · checked 10/18/2026, 10:01:29 PM · change unavailableCATEGORY SIGNALS
Under the surface.
Cybersecurity
—At least five distinct stories from two sources in 72 hours are required.
0 distinct stories · 0 sources · last 72hCrypto
—At least five distinct stories from two sources in 72 hours are required.
1 distinct stories · 1 sources · last 72hEconomy
—At least five distinct stories from two sources in 72 hours are required.
1 distinct stories · 1 sources · last 72hGeopolitics
—At least five distinct stories from two sources in 72 hours are required.
0 distinct stories · 0 sources · last 72hTechnology
—At least five distinct stories from two sources in 72 hours are required.
1 distinct stories · 1 sources · last 72hHow we calculate it.
01 / CollectRecent metadata from named sources. Article titles retain links and timestamps. Duplicate title clusters count once; each source contributes at most eight stories per category.
02 / Require coverageEach category needs five distinct stories from two sources within 72 hours. A global score needs four covered categories. Missing coverage is shown, never imputed.
03 / Score45% normalized story volume (capped at 20) plus 55% share of headlines containing explicit risk terms. The output is rounded to 0–100. This simple model can be biased and is experimental.
No claim is made that the labels measure objective danger. Index history begins only after real calculations are stored.